Anthony van Dyck

Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)

Anthony van Dyck  Portret van Anna Wake (1605-voor 1669) Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)
Anthony van Dyck  Portret van Anna Wake (1605-voor 1669) Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)
Anthony van Dyck  Portret van Anna Wake (1605-voor 1669) Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)
Anthony van Dyck  Portret van Anna Wake (1605-voor 1669) Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)
Anthony van Dyck  Portret van Anna Wake (1605-voor 1669) Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)
Anthony van Dyck  Portret van Anna Wake (1605-voor 1669) Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)

Anthony van Dyck
Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)

Visible à Salle 12

In 1627, the Antwerp cloth merchant Peeter Stevens had his portrait painted by Anthony van Dyck. When Stevens got married a year later, he commissioned Van Dyck to paint this portrait of Anna as well. Anna was placed on the left, so that she did not have her back turned to Peeter. But actually convention dictated that the man should hang on the left and the woman on the right.

After Rubens, Van Dyck was the most important portraitist of his day. He was popular because he made his patrons look just a bit more beautiful and elegant than they really were.

Détails techniques
Anthony van Dyck  Portret van Anna Wake (1605-voor 1669) Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)

Anthony van Dyck
Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)

Visible à Salle 12

Vers le haut

The wealthy cloth merchant Peeter Stevens (c. 1590-1668) was thirty-seven years old when he had his portrait painted by Van Dyck in 1627. On 12 March 1628, Stevens married twenty-two-yearold Anna Wake (1605-before 1669), the eldest daughter of the Englishman Lionel Wake, a Catholic merchant and resident of Antwerp, who was a good friend of Rubens. The portrait of Anna Wake was most likely commissioned to mark their marriage, as the pendant to the existing portrait of her husband. The square ring on Wake’s left thumb is probably her wedding ring.

Beautifully dressed and holding a fan of black and white ostrich feathers, she turns towards her new husband as she looks at the viewer. Her portrayal to her husband’s right - the position of honour in heraldry - is unusual for a woman, but it can be explained by the fact that Peeter Stevens’s portrait was painted earlier as an independent work. In contrast to Wake, he is depicted almost frontally, but because both his gaze and his prominently displayed left glove point to the left, Van Dyck was forced to place Wake on his right-hand side.

When Van Dyck returned from Italy in September 1627, the art lover Peeter Stevens lost no time in having his portrait painted by the successful master. The aristocratic elegance of his figure and the apparent ease with which Van Dyck executed the portrait are characteristic of the Italian Renaissance ideal of sprezzatura (‘apparent effortlessness’), of which Van Dyck was the unrivalled master. The gesture made by Stevens’s left hand in the costly leather glove with richly embroidered gauntlet can only be described as distinguished.

Van Dyck’s fascination with clothing is perhaps even more in evidence in the portrait of Anna Wake, whose dress, which reflects the latest in French fashion, was portrayed with a relish for detail. Her flat, starched collar and cuffs are trimmed with the newest style of Flemish bobbin lace. The puff sleeves are also worth mentioning: the upper sleeve, over a white under-sleeve, consists of black strips that are held together in the middle with a blue ribbon.

(this is a reworked version of a text published in: E. Runia et al, Mauritshuis: Highlights of the Collection, The Hague 2017, p. 131)

Détails

Informations générales
Anthony van Dyck (Antwerp 1599 - 1641 London)
Portrait of Anna Wake (1605-before 1669)
painting
240
Salle 12
Détails des matériaux et techniques
oil
canvas
112.5 x 99.3 cm
Inscriptions
left of centre: AET. SUA 22. AN 1628 / Ant.° van dijck fecit

Origine

Peeter Stevens, Antwerp; Govert van Slingelandt, The Hague, in or before 1752-1767; his widow, Agatha Huydecoper, The Hague, 1767-1768; Van Slingelandt sale, The Hague, 18 May 1768 (Lugt 1683), no. 6; the entire collection sold to Prince William V; Prince William V, The Hague, 1768-1795; confiscated by the French, transferred to the Muséum Central des Arts/Musée Napoléon (Musée du Louvre), Paris, 1795-1815; Royal Picture Gallery, housed in the Prince William V Gallery, The Hague, 1816; transferred to the Mauritshuis, 1822